FUNDING SOURCES

.

POSSIBLE SOURCES OF FUNDING

To be added to this list, please contact:

Lindsey V. Maness, Jr., Chairman

Resources & Technology Symposia of Colorado, Llc.

12875 West 15th Drive

Golden, CO 80401-3501 USA

Tel: 303-237-6590 E-Mail: lvmaness@china-resources.net

 

Introduction

Possibly due to the severe financial crunch in Asia, many of our colleagues have been forced to seek sponsorships. Any organizations added to this list are possible sources of funding. While rumors abound about agencies offering support, it is impossible to verify many of them. As more possible funding sources are discovered, relevant information will be entered on this web-site. Those interested in these programs should personally verify their eligibility from information on the relevant web-site(s) before directly contacting possible funding sources.

One of the purposes of the CEAR 2,000 Symposium is to provide information to assist private-sector firms to acquire capital and guidance for international business. Consequently, many possible funding organizations are listed herein that might assist firms.

 

It has been impossible to verify even the availability of many of the rumored funding programs listed. Consequently, an attempt has been made to list organizations, with program names and contact information. This is not to imply that all programs are listed, or even that those listed remain active: it is up to the users of this information to discover that for themselves.

 

The conventional way to list these would have been in the form of "Organizational Charts". This was not rigorously done because many portions of organizations have totally different programs from the parent, and vice-versa. Further, organizations follow different "styles of operation" that largely determine whether funding or other assistance will actually be made available. The influences that determine whether or not a specific request will be viewed favorably are not easily diagrammed as in an organizational chart. They include: 1. statutory (legal); 2. administrative (by order of a superior); 3. judicial (by order of a court); 4. regulatory ("laws" self-imposed by a bureaucracy); 5. historical (following traditional means); 6. force of personality (will imposed by an individual or by a clique); and 7. others. With these often contradictory influences as the reality, it is usually best to approach each organization separately, even when part of a larger organization.

§

§

§

BRITAIN (UK)

 

§

§

§

CHINA (PRC)

 

§

§

§

FRANCE

 

§

§

§

GERMANY (DEUTSCHLAND)

 

§

§

§

JAPAN

 

§

§

§

KAZAKHSTAN

 

§

§

§

MONGOLIA

 

§

§

§

NORTH ATLANTIC TREATY ORGANIZATION (NATO)

 

§

§

§

RUSSIA

 

§

§

§

SAUDI ARABIA

 

§

§

§

SOUTHEAST ASIA TREATY ORGANIZATION (SEATO)

 

§

§

§

TAIWAN

 

§

§

§

TURKEY

 

§

§

§

UNITED NATIONS (UN)

 

§

§

§

UNITED STATES OF AMERICA (USA)

                                     

Revised on August 11th, 2,000.

Back